Pam Bondi To Tulsi Gabbard: Powerful Women Who Are Protecting Jeffrey Epstein And Why?

Jeffrey Epstein was a convicted sex offender and pedophile who used his wealth and connections to orchestrate a decade-long sex trafficking ring involving dozens of underage girls, some as young as 14 years old. He died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. His accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for her role in recruiting and grooming minors for sexual abuse.

The scale of Epstein's crimes is staggering. FBI investigations documented a systematic operation in which girls were recruited from schools, shopping malls, and massage parlours, then subjected to repeated sexual abuse at Epstein's properties in Manhattan, Palm Beach, his private Caribbean island, and elsewhere. Many victims were then coerced into recruiting other underage girls, creating a pyramid of exploitation.

Yet in the year since Congress mandated the release of all government files on Epstein, the pursuit of justice has been derailed by political theatre, bungled document releases, and deflective rhetoric from figures who should be championing survivors, not shielding the powerful men connected to their abuser.

Powerful Women Who Are Protecting Jeffrey Epstein

Pam Bondi

Attorney General Pam Bondi now sits at the centre of what both Democrats and Republicans are calling a cover-up. Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support (427-1 in the House, unanimous in the Senate) and signed by President Trump on November 19, 2025, the Justice Department was required to release all unclassified Epstein-related documents within 30 days.

The department failed spectacularly.

• December 19, 2025: DOJ releases initial batch more than a month late, with over 500 pages entirely blacked out
• Victims exposed: The department failed to properly redact survivors' identities while shielding powerful figures. According to attorneys for survivors, at least 31 victims who were children when abused had their names left visible in the documents
• Perpetrators protected: Names like billionaire Leslie Wexner, described by the FBI as an Epstein co-conspirator, were initially redacted, only restored after Republican Rep. Thomas Massie caught the ‘red-handed’ error during congressional testimony
• January 30, 2026: DOJ releases 3.5 million pages but claims this fulfils their obligation, despite identifying 6 million potentially responsive pages

On February 11, 2026, Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee with Epstein survivors seated directly behind her. What followed was a masterclass in evasion.

When Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal asked survivors in the room to raise their hands if they hadn't been able to meet with the DOJ about their abuse, every victim raised their hand. Jayapal then asked Bondi to turn around and apologise directly to them for the DOJ's failures.

Bondi refused, "I'm not going to get in the gutter for her theatrics."

Rep. Jamie Raskin accused her directly, "As attorney general, you're siding with the perpetrators, and you're ignoring the victims. That will be your legacy unless you act quickly to change course. You're running a massive Epstein cover-up right out of the Department of Justice."

Republican Rep Thomas Massie, co-sponsor of the Transparency Act, was equally scathing, "Literally the worst thing you could do to the survivors, you did," he said, referring to the exposed victim identities. "They're getting phone calls. A lot of these people didn't want to be known."

Rather than answer substantive questions about missing files or potential prosecutions, Bondi spent five hours deflecting, shouting at lawmakers, and launching personal attacks. She called Rep Massie's concerns ‘Trump derangement syndrome,’ labelled Rep Jamie Raskin a ‘washed-up loser lawyer, not even a lawyer,’ and repeatedly pivoted to praising President Trump and citing stock market performance.

Perhaps most disturbing: photographs from the hearing show Bondi brought a binder containing Rep. Jayapal's search history of the DOJ's Epstein database, raising serious constitutional concerns about executive branch surveillance of Congress. Jayapal responded: "It is totally inappropriate and against the separations of powers for the DOJ to surveil us as we search the Epstein files."

Megyn Kelly

On November 12, 2025, broadcaster Megyn Kelly made comments that drew condemnation from across the political spectrum, including from fellow conservatives.

On her SiriusXM show, Kelly stated, "I do know somebody very, very close to this case who was in a position to know virtually everything. And this person has told me from the start that Jeffrey Epstein, in this person's view, was not a pedophile, but that he was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15-year-old girls... He wasn't into like 8-year-olds."

Kelly continued: "I think there is a difference. There's a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?"

‼️Megyn Kelly DEFENDS Epstein—Claims He Wasn't a PEDOPHILE, Just Into 'BARELY LEGAL' 15yo Girls! 😱 "Difference Between 15 & 5?!"

America, WE HAVE A PROBLEM!! pic.twitter.com/lXj4XvHpPG

— i Expose Racists & Pedos (@SeeRacists) November 13, 2025

The backlash was immediate and fierce. Former child actresses, teenagers on TikTok, Democratic strategists, and even conservative Fox News host Mark Levin condemned the remarks.

Kelly's attempt to distinguish between victims based on age fundamentally misunderstands both the law and the moral gravity of Epstein's crimes. The age of consent ranges from 16 to 18 across U.S. states. Sexual activity with anyone under 16 is illegal everywhere in America. More importantly, Epstein's victims were trafficked, groomed, and exploited—crimes that don't become less monstrous based on whether a child has reached puberty.

Kelly later expressed distrust of Bondi's handling of the case but never fully walked back her controversial framing of Epstein's crimes.

Karoline Leavitt

As White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt has repeatedly defended the administration's messaging around the Epstein files, even as that messaging proved false.

In early 2025, Bondi suggested an Epstein ‘client list’ existed and was ‘sitting on her desk.’ This claim was used to build political pressure and generate media attention. By July 2025, the DOJ admitted no such list existed.

When confronted with this contradiction, Leavitt dismissed criticism as partisan attacks, tweeting: "If not for the Jeffrey Epstein story, CNN would be forced to talk about how Chuck Schumer and the Democrats got shellacked by President Trump... It's clear this is another Democrat + Mainstream Media hoax, fueled by fake outrage, to distract from the President's wins."

ALSO READ- How to Find Names in Epstein Files Library in One Click: Step-by-Step Guide

Tulsi Gabbard, Kristi Noem, Maria Bartiromo, and Laura Ingraham

While Tulsi Gabbard, Kristi Noem, Maria Bartiromo, and Laura Ingraham haven't directly spearheaded the handling or defence of the Epstein file releases, their broader roles within the conservative political and media ecosystem warrant examination:

• Tulsi Gabbard (Director of National Intelligence): Has pivoted to unrelated political controversies at key moments during the Epstein scandal, deflecting attention
• Kristi Noem (Secretary of Homeland Security): Her alignment with broader administration narratives places her within the political structure critics say shields powerful interests
• Maria Bartiromo: The Fox Business host has repeatedly amplified administration talking points, often reframing criticism of the Epstein file handling as partisan attacks rather than substantive accountability concerns
• Laura Ingraham: While not directly commenting on the Epstein files, her history of defending contentious Trump administration positions places her within the same ideological media apparatus

These figures form part of a broader conservative infrastructure that has consistently prioritised political loyalty over uncomfortable truths about the powerful.

The Cost of Political Cover

The Epstein files controversy reveals a disturbing pattern: when forced to choose between transparency and political protection, key figures in this administration have consistently chosen the latter.

Survivors of Epstein's abuse, many of whom were 14, 15, 16 years old when victimised, have watched as:

• Their identities were carelessly exposed while perpetrators' names were shielded
• An Attorney General refused to apologise or even face them directly
• A prominent broadcaster minimised their trauma with grotesque semantic distinctions
• Political operatives framed their quest for justice as a ‘hoax’ and ‘fake outrage’

Jeffrey Epstein sexually trafficked and abused dozens of children. Ghislaine Maxwell is in prison. Yet the network of enablers, co-conspirators, and powerful men who facilitated this abuse remains largely in the shadows, protected by excessive redactions, political deflection, and an Attorney General more interested in defending Donald Trump than pursuing justice.

When Pam Bondi shouts down lawmakers instead of answering their questions, when Megyn Kelly parses the ages of child victims to minimise the word ‘pedophile,’ when the White House dismisses survivor advocacy as a partisan ‘hoax’, they send a clear message: powerful men matter more than the children whose lives were destroyed.

Until there is full transparency, real accountability, and genuine contrition from those in power, the Epstein files controversy will remain what survivors fear most: another instance of the system failing the vulnerable to protect the elite.

ALSO READ- Epstein Files: Tech CEOs and Business Leaders Named in Jeffrey Epstein Emails

Keep reading Herzindagi for more such stories.